> Hi, Chris
>
> On Tuesday 31 July 2001 21:07, Chris Mason wrote:
>> I had to keep some of the flush_dirty_buffer calls as page_launder
>> wasn't triggering enough i/o on its own. What I'd like to do now is
>> experiment with changing bdflush to only write pages off the inactive
>> dirty lists.
>
> Will kupdate continue to enforce the "no dirty buffer older than
> XX" guarantee?
Yes, kupdate still calls flush_dirty_buffers(1). I'm curious to see how
your write early stuff interacts with it all though....
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/