On Tuesday 31 July 2001 21:07, Chris Mason wrote:
> I had to keep some of the flush_dirty_buffer calls as page_launder
> wasn't triggering enough i/o on its own. What I'd like to do now is
> experiment with changing bdflush to only write pages off the inactive
> dirty lists.
Will kupdate continue to enforce the "no dirty buffer older than
XX" guarantee?
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/