Re: Has the iptables security patch been vetted?

Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:09:47 +1000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] pedantic code cleanup - am I wasting my time with this?"
Previous message: Paul Komarek: "FA311 fails on set_power_state()"
Maybe in reply to: Dale Amon: "Has the iptables security patch been vetted?"

In message <20010423204825.H26083@vnl.com> you write:
> I'm sure you've run across this one:
>
> http://netfilter.samba.org/security-fix/
>
> I'd like to know how official this patch is, ie how
> well checked out?

Hi Dale,

The preferred patch is available, and has been tested (several
new testsuite tests now exist) and submitted to Linus (et. al):

http://netfilter.filewatcher.org/security-fix/ftp-security2.patch
http://netfilter.samba.org/security-fix/ftp-security2.patch
http://netfilter.gnumonks.org/security-fix/ftp-security2.patch

Hope that helps,
Rusty.

--
Premature optmztion is rt of all evl. --DK
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] pedantic code cleanup - am I wasting my time with this?"
Previous message: Paul Komarek: "FA311 fails on set_power_state()"
Maybe in reply to: Dale Amon: "Has the iptables security patch been vetted?"