Somebody in the lute list commented the Agazzari article:
'The Agazzari material, delightful as it is, is a very good example of the old "prescriptive" vs "descriptive" argument in traditional musicology. Take Aggy's enchilada with a grain of salt, as it is prescriptive. How annoying the quote about major cadences, so clearly wrong. Why? Well, there are lots of tab parts with minor endings.'
Just for fun I made a small 'research' of what was claimed. I counted the pieces starting in 'minor', and the their ending chords in a few lute books . There is so much modality still, in music of early 1600, that talking about minor key is perhaps not proper.
I also took into account only the final chords, because it is not always clear, what is a medial cadence (and analysing this would have taken too much time for the moment!)
Molinaro Kapsberger Galilei Piccinini Pittoni Zamboni 1599 1611 1620 1623 1669 1718 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pieces starting 51 16 33 44 42 8 in minor - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Final chord: in same major 43 11 26 28 25 - in same minor - - - - 13 7 without a third 8 4 7 9 4 1 in 4th grade - 1 - 5 - - major in 3rd grade - - - 2 - - major
So it seems to be very clear that in the lute music of Agazzari's time it was a norm to end pieces in a major chord! In those books printed before 1650 I didn't find any example of "lots of tab parts with minor endings".
It is interesting to see how Pittoni already allows minor chords at end, but still majority of his finals are in major. Zamboni was living in a new era, where major endings in minor pieces would perhaps been considered 'old fashioned'.
Arto Wikla