On Monday 14 Jul 2003 15:20, Martin Zwickel wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Anybody got a working patch for nvidia 4363 to let it work with the
> 2.6.0-test1 kernel?
> The 2.5 nvidia patch doesn't work for the 2.6 kernel.
Just a quick hack to the official unofficial patch! It's working OK for me
right now. You'll need to apply the 2.5 patch then this one afterwards.
-- Ian.--Boundary-00=_RXsE/S6arPbU6tP Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-4363-2.5-2.6.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-4363-2.5-2.6.diff"
--- NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-4363/nv-linux.h.old 2003-07-14 15:39:35.000000000 +0100 +++ NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-4363/nv-linux.h 2003-07-14 15:47:54.000000000 +0100 @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ # define KERNEL_2_4 #elif LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 0) # define KERNEL_2_5 +#elif LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2, 7, 0) +# define KERNEL_2_6 #else # error This driver does not support development kernels! #endif @@ -46,7 +48,7 @@ #define __SMP__ #endif -#if defined (MODVERSIONS) && !defined (KERNEL_2_5) +#if defined (MODVERSIONS) && !(defined (KERNEL_2_5) || defined(KERNEL_2_6)) #include <linux/modversions.h> #endif @@ -62,7 +64,7 @@ #include <linux/poll.h> /* poll_wait */ #include <linux/delay.h> /* mdelay, udelay */ -#ifdef KERNEL_2_5 +#if defined(KERNEL_2_5) || defined(KERNEL_2_6) #include <linux/sched.h> /* suser(), capable() replacement */ #include <linux/moduleparam.h> /* module_param() */ #include <linux/smp_lock.h> /* kernel_locked */ @@ -126,7 +128,7 @@ #define PUT_MODULE_SYMBOL(sym) inter_module_put((char *) sym) #define NV_VMA_PRIVATE(vma) ((vma)->vm_private_data) -#ifdef KERNEL_2_5 +#if defined(KERNEL_2_5) || defined(KERNEL_2_6) # define NV_DEVICE_NUMBER(_minor) ((kdev_val(_minor)) & 0x0f) # define NV_IS_CONTROL_DEVICE(_minor) (((kdev_val(_minor)) & 0xff) == 0xff) # define NV_IS_SUSER() capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) @@ -150,7 +152,7 @@ # define NV_MODULE_PARAMETER(x) MODULE_PARM(x, "i") #endif -#ifndef KERNEL_2_5 +#if !defined(KERNEL_2_5) && !defined(KERNEL_2_6) typedef void irqreturn_t; # define IRQ_NONE # define IRQ_RETVAL(x) @@ -163,7 +165,7 @@ typedef void* devfs_handle_t; #endif -#ifdef KERNEL_2_5 +#if defined(KERNEL_2_5) || defined(KERNEL_2_6) #define NV_DEVFS_REGISTER(_name, _minor) \ ({ \ devfs_handle_t __handle = NULL; \ @@ -193,7 +195,7 @@ * relevant releases to date use it. This version was backported to 2.4 by * RedHat without means to identify the change, hence this hack. */ -#ifdef KERNEL_2_5 +#if defined(KERNEL_2_5) || defined(KERNEL_2_6) #define NV_REMAP_PAGE_RANGE(a, b...) remap_page_range(vma, a, ## b) #else #if defined(REMAP_PAGE_RANGE_5) --- NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-4363/nv.c.old 2003-07-14 15:51:39.000000000 +0100 +++ NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-4363/nv.c 2003-07-14 15:49:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ nv_printf(NV_DBG_ERRORS, "nvidia: loading %s\n", pNVRM_ID); -#if defined(CONFIG_DEVFS_FS) && !defined(KERNEL_2_5) +#if defined(CONFIG_DEVFS_FS) && !(defined(KERNEL_2_5) || defined(KERNEL_2_6)) rc = devfs_register_chrdev(nv_major, "nvidia", &nv_fops); #else rc = register_chrdev(nv_major, "nvidia", &nv_fops); @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ return 0; failed: -#if defined(CONFIG_DEVFS_FS) && !defined(KERNEL_2_5) +#if defined(CONFIG_DEVFS_FS) && !(defined(KERNEL_2_5) || defined(KERNEL_2_6)) devfs_unregister_chrdev(nv_major, "nvidia"); #else unregister_chrdev(nv_major, "nvidia"); @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ } } -#if defined(CONFIG_DEVFS_FS) && !defined(KERNEL_2_5) +#if defined(CONFIG_DEVFS_FS) && !(defined(KERNEL_2_5) || defined(KERNEL_2_6)) rc = devfs_unregister_chrdev(nv_major, "nvidia"); #else rc = unregister_chrdev(nv_major, "nvidia"); @@ -1461,7 +1461,7 @@ switch (_IOC_NR(cmd)) { -#if !defined(KERNEL_2_5) +#if !defined(KERNEL_2_5) && !defined(KERNEL_2_6) /* debug tool; zap the module use count so we can unload driver */ /* even if it is confused */ case _IOC_NR(NV_IOCTL_MODULE_RESET):
--Boundary-00=_RXsE/S6arPbU6tP--
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/