Interesting. I don't know how much smaller the timeslice can be before
different hardware will be affected. Can you report what cpu and video card
you're using? Unfortunately I don't have a range of hardware to test it on
and I chose the aggressive 1/5th timeslice size. Can you try with ISO_PENALTY
set to 2 instead?
> And btw, as I am interested in scheduler improvements, do you have a
> testcase where the stock scheduler does the bad thing? Preferably without
> KDE nor Mozilla (I don't have them installed, and I'll have access to a
> decent connection in september).
Transparency and antialiased fonts are good triggers. Launcing Xterm with
transparency has been known to cause skips. Also the obvious make -j 4 kernel
compiles, and
while true ; do a=2 ; done
as a fast onset full cpu hog
> BTW2, you all seem to test interactivity with xmms. Just for those like me
> that didn't noticed, I have just found that it skips much less with alsa's
> OSS emulation than with alsa-xmms.
Anything that increases the signal to noise ratio at helping us pick up
skips/problems is useful, but this can help those that _don't_ want skips so
thanks.
> Thanks,
Thank you very much for testing and reporting.
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/