Re: [RFC] KBUILD 2.5 issues/regressions
Alistair J Strachan (alistair@devzero.co.uk)
Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:06:33 +0100
On Friday 11 July 2003 19:01, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 06:56:53PM +0100, Alistair J Strachan wrote:
> > On Friday 11 July 2003 18:47, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 19:40, Alistair J Strachan wrote:
> > > > o The state of kbuild in shipped (distribution) kernels must be such
> > > > that the construction of external modules can be done without having
> > > > to modify the shipped kernel-source package.
> > >
> > > that is actually not hard; I just did this in a RH rpm like way last
> > > week.
> >
> > I cannot see how you can make modversions modules without first building
> > vmlinux. This "RPM" presumably does not ship with vmlinux constructed
>
> It does actually.
Ah. In that case, I suppose it's all moot and won't end up being an issue. It
just strikes me that vmlinux would not have to be included in a distro 2.4
kernel, because it is not a "dependency" of the build system. If this is how
distros will operate, then just forget about it.
>
> > Try it with the NVIDIA driver
>
> no think you I prefer not to touch that with a 10 foot pole
Interesting snip of my original sentence.
Cheers,
Alistair.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/