Re: 2.4.21-rmap15j: sometimes processes stuck in state D, WCHAN 'down'

Brian Ristuccia (bristucc@sw.starentnetworks.com)
Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:42:53 -0400


On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:30:09PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
>
> > Is anyone else seeing this problem with stock 2.4.21 or 2.4.21-rmap15j?
>
> I haven't heard of anything like this. Could you please get
> a backtrace of all the stuck processes with alt+sysrq+t and
> decode the backtraces with ksymoops ?
>

This is actually the backtrace from ctrl-scrollock or whatever - the
machine where it happened didn't have magic sysrq. If the difference is
important, I can put a magic sysrq kernel everywhere and try to reproduce it
again.

Jul 10 10:18:19 grunt1 kernel: ld D D6E5C848 0 25131 1
25142 25147 (NOTLB)
Jul 10 10:18:19 grunt1 kernel: Call Trace: [dput+25/340] [__down+108/200]
[__down_failed+8/12] [.text.lock.namei+53/1246] [link_path_walk+1786/2460]
Jul 10 10:18:19 grunt1 kernel: ld D D6E5C848 0 25142 1
25131 (NOTLB)
Jul 10 10:18:19 grunt1 kernel: Call Trace: [dput+25/340] [__down+108/200]
[__down_failed+8/12] [.text.lock.namei+53/1246] [link_path_walk+1786/2460]
Jul 10 10:18:19 grunt1 kernel: ld D D6E5C848 0 25143 1
25144 7575 (NOTLB)
Jul 10 10:18:19 grunt1 kernel: Call Trace: [dput+25/340] [__down+108/200]
[__down_failed+8/12] [.text.lock.namei+53/1246] [link_path_walk+1786/2460]
Jul 10 10:18:19 grunt1 kernel: ld D D6E5C848 0 25144 1
25147 25143 (NOTLB)
Jul 10 10:18:19 grunt1 kernel: Call Trace: [dput+25/340] [__down+108/200]
[__down_failed+8/12] [.text.lock.namei+53/1246] [link_path_walk+1786/2460]
Jul 10 10:18:19 grunt1 kernel: ld D D7A6A000 408 25147 1
25131 25144 (NOTLB)

-- 
Brian Ristuccia
bristucc@sw.starentnetworks.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/