Re: 2.5.74-mm3 - apm_save_cpus() Macro still bombs out
Thomas Schlichter (schlicht@uni-mannheim.de)
Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:59:49 +0200
On Thursday 10 July 2003 11:48, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Thursday 10 July 2003 11:27, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >> Could you try the following?
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:42:35AM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> > OK, I tried it. For me it compiles!
> > But the size of the resulting objectfile's text section is about 64bytes
> > larger than with my patch. So it seems that gcc3.3 wasn't able to
> > optimize away all the unneeded stuff...
> > And I don't think my patch is that ugly, but hey, it's your decision...
>
> 64B? Why do you care?
It's not the 64B...
I care about the unneeded but executed code!
But I'm a hopeless perfectionist caring about such nits...
And I don't know why everybody hates my patches... ;-(
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/