Re: 2.5.74-mm1

Davide Libenzi (davidel@xmailserver.org)
Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:29:59 -0700 (PDT)


On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> Indeed. But maybe true (bounded CPU) realtime, reliable, would more
> accurately reflect what the user actually wants for some apps?

Hopefully I'll have a couple of hours free to code and test the
SCHED_SOFTRR idea ;) It's hard to push for a new POSIX definition though :)
Looking at recent posts it seems that this is not the only problem though.
It seems interactivity lowered in the latest versions of the scheduler.
The good news is that Ingo is back on Earth and he'll fix it :)

- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/