I had to rewrite seq_read so that when it calls the start operation it
passes a pointer to a struct (not an loff_t) with iterator info and
also a pointer to the proc_dir_entry data field.
Would it be possible to modify seq_file to give easier access to the
data field of proc_dir_entry, or is seq_file too general for that to
be practical?
-- --Ed L Cashin | PGP public key: ecashin@uga.edu | http://noserose.net/e/pgp/- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/