printk in atomic context

=?koi8-r?Q?=22?=Andrey Borzenkov=?koi8-r?Q?=22=20?= (arvidjaar@mail.ru)
Wed, 09 Jul 2003 10:18:34 +0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: undefined reference to `xapic_support`"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [announce, patch] 4G/4G split on x86, 64 GB RAM (and more) support"
Next in thread: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: printk in atomic context"
Reply: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: printk in atomic context"

Is it possible (safe) to use printk in atomic context, i.e. under
spinlock or inside of preemption-disabled region?

The same question about 2.4 (here I guess only spinlock?)

TIA

-andrey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: undefined reference to `xapic_support`"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [announce, patch] 4G/4G split on x86, 64 GB RAM (and more) support"
Next in thread: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: printk in atomic context"
Reply: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: printk in atomic context"