Re: Status of the IO scheduler fixes for 2.4

[Marc-Christian Petersen]

On Friday 04 July 2003 23:37, Chris Mason wrote:

Hi Chris,

> > If the IO fairness still doesnt
> > get somewhat better for general use (well get isolated user reports and
> > benchmarks for both the two patches), then I might consider the q->full
> > patch (it has throughtput drawbacks and I prefer avoiding a tunable
> > there).
now there is io-stalls-10 in .22-pre3 (lowlat elev. + fixpausing). Could you 
please send "q->full patch" as ontop of -pre3? :-)

Thank you.

ciao, Marc