Re: [RFC 3/3] dm: v4 ioctl interface

[Joe Thornber]

On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 03:05:07PM -0500, Kevin Corry wrote:
> The "unregister" call needs to be before the actual rename. Same patch as a 
> couple weeks ago.

Agreed.

> > +static int check_name(const char *name)
> > +{
> > +	if (strchr(name, '/')) {
> > +		DMWARN("invalid device name");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> Can't we allow slashes in device names? I thought we discussed this before 
> (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=104628092700011&r=1&w=2). Any reason for the 
> change?

I think I made the wrong decision before.  Still thinking about it though.

> Does this imply that if the dm_swap_table() call fails, then the "inactive" 
> mapping is automatically deleted?

Yes, that is the behaviour ATM.  Would you rather it didn't ?

> As a side note, the __bind() function in dm.c currently will never return an 
> error, so dm_swap_table() doesn't necessarily need to check for one.

y, __bind can become void.

- Joe