fredag 27. juni 2003, 22:43, skrev Andre Tomt:
> On fre, 2003-06-27 at 22:24, Svein Ove Aas wrote:
> > > http://lartc.org/wondershaper/
> >
> > I wrote something like that myself once.
> > It's a good shaper, but it works by *capping* up/download speeds and
> > rearranging the priorities locally, which wouldn't help me a bit.
>
> By capping the speed below the link speed most modems will usually avoid
> bursting. IMHO it's mostly a net gain in usability even though you don't
> get the same raw download speeds as without capping.
I'll try it if the F-RTO option doesn't work. Might as well.
It might actually work; the problem at the moment is that as far as the kernel
is concerned my usual uplink works at 10Mbit/s++ for a fraction of a second
and then downright drops most of the rest of the data it's sent until the
next burst. If I cap it sufficiently that it can't overflow either the line
(on average) or my cable modem's buffers, that should work.
It makes sense.
Now, how come I didn't think of that myself?
- - Svein Ove Aas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+/MiN9OlFkai3rMARArzXAKDTITRw3swGcINfEBAlteJlCS2CiACgpVIw
FpqXUkhx8iJct7nEuLaZ3Xc=
=GisS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/