Re: [PATCH][RFC] irq handling code consolidation (common part)

Miles Bader (miles@lsi.nec.co.jp)
27 Jun 2003 15:04:13 +0900

Andrey Panin <pazke@donpac.ru> writes:
> BTW sparc implementation of irq_itoa() uses static buffer for the formatted
> string, is it really irq/preempt safe ?

Passinf in a result buffer seems simplest (maybe have the arch define a
macro for the max-length).

[btw the name `irq_itoa' seems a bit odd; how about `irq_name' (or
`irq_rep' for clu-lovers)?]

-miLes

-- 
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
has to be us.  -- Jerry Garcia
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/