Re: developers and GPL in products (Was: Re: GPL violations by wireless manufacturers)

[Zack Gilburd]

--Boundary-02=_HyO++2PLeeiOr6Y
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 24 June 2003 11:25, Roger Larsson wrote:
> A customer of a product B that uses GPL project A can
> require the source for A. But what about the primary developer?
> Suppose the company charges an obscene amount of money for
> the product (that might be an enhanced project A, like a patch to allow
> compilation on Win32) - the primary developer might not afford to buy that
> product.

Not exactly.  By my understanding of the GPL, if you plan on distributing=20
binaries outside of your corporation, you MUST make the source available to=
=20
any and all third parties.  In adition, you must bundle the source code wit=
h=20
the binary.

That's just what I have read from the GPL -- IANAL.

=2D-=20
Zack Gilburd
http://tehunlose.com

--Boundary-02=_HyO++2PLeeiOr6Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA++OyHp5pFZoJAq2wRAoulAJkBxNbY0k8GKeUq3MpvegvOJIrE0QCfYueN
MA+e+YnfBrQZMDEd1WMiNBU=
=qF5x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_HyO++2PLeeiOr6Y--