Re: [PATCH] reimplement pci proc name

Matthew Wilcox (willy@debian.org)
Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:11:32 +0100

On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:02:28PM +0200, Martin Zwickel wrote:
> Hi Matthew!
>
> Just one question:
> If pci_name_bus copies the bus' hex to name and always returns 0,
> the "if (!pci_name_bus(name, bus)) return -EEXIST;" would always be true, right?
>
> Or did I miss something?

That's currently correct. My understanding is that some architectures
would like to decline to create overlapping bus numbers.

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/