> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:11:07PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Followup to: <20030618011455.GF542@hopper.phunnypharm.org>
> > By author: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > > >
> > > > I have no problem setting up CNAMEs in kernel.org if people are OK with
> > > > it. Setting up actual servers is another matter.
> > >
> > > CNAMES on kernel.org would be perfect.
> > >
> >
> > So right now cvs, svn and bk all -> kernel.bkbits.net?
>
> We only need cvs and svn; bk is hosted at linux.bkbits.net.
Why would you *not* have bk.kernel.org as a CNAME? For ease of memory,
etc, it makes sense to do that. If someone knows about cvs.kernel.org,
they are more likely to guess the bk address. And vice-versa, of course.
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/