On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 02:02, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:47, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > At 12:05 AM 6/20/2003 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > >Testers required. A version for -ck will be created soon.
> >
> > That idea definitely needs some refinement.
>
> Actually no it needs a bugfix even more than a refinement!
>
> The best_sleep_decay should be 60, NOT 60*Hz
Here's a fixed patch.
Con
--Boundary-00=_o9d8+Xno5lG9ejc
Content-Type: text/x-diff;
  charset="iso-8859-1";
  name="patch-sleep_decay-0306200203"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="patch-sleep_decay-0306200203"
diff -Naurp linux-2.5.72/kernel/sched.c linux-2.5.72-test/kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.5.72/kernel/sched.c	2003-06-18 22:47:25.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.5.72-test/kernel/sched.c	2003-06-19 22:23:33.000000000 +1000
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@
 #define EXIT_WEIGHT		3
 #define PRIO_BONUS_RATIO	25
 #define INTERACTIVE_DELTA	2
-#define MAX_SLEEP_AVG		(10*HZ)
+#define MAX_SLEEP_AVG		(HZ)
+#define BEST_SLEEP_DECAY	(60)
 #define STARVATION_LIMIT	(10*HZ)
 #define NODE_THRESHOLD		125
 
@@ -318,7 +319,7 @@ static int effective_prio(task_t *p)
 	if (rt_task(p))
 		return p->prio;
 
-	bonus = MAX_USER_PRIO*PRIO_BONUS_RATIO*p->sleep_avg/MAX_SLEEP_AVG/100 -
+	bonus = MAX_USER_PRIO*PRIO_BONUS_RATIO*(p->best_sleep_avg/BEST_SLEEP_DECAY)/MAX_SLEEP_AVG/100 -
 			MAX_USER_PRIO*PRIO_BONUS_RATIO/100/2;
 	prio = p->static_prio - bonus;
@@ -371,6 +372,8 @@ static inline void activate_task(task_t 
 			sleep_avg = MAX_SLEEP_AVG;
 		if (p->sleep_avg != sleep_avg) {
 			p->sleep_avg = sleep_avg;
+			if ((sleep_avg * BEST_SLEEP_DECAY) > p->best_sleep_avg)
+				p->best_sleep_avg = sleep_avg * BEST_SLEEP_DECAY;
 			p->prio = effective_prio(p);
 		}
 	}
@@ -551,6 +554,7 @@ void wake_up_forked_process(task_t * p)
 	 */
 	current->sleep_avg = current->sleep_avg * PARENT_PENALTY / 100;
 	p->sleep_avg = p->sleep_avg * CHILD_PENALTY / 100;
+	p->best_sleep_avg = p->sleep_avg * BEST_SLEEP_DECAY;
 	p->prio = effective_prio(p);
 	set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id());
 
@@ -1200,6 +1204,8 @@ void scheduler_tick(int user_ticks, int 
 	 */
 	if (p->sleep_avg)
 		p->sleep_avg--;
+	if (p->best_sleep_avg)
+		p->best_sleep_avg--;
 	if (unlikely(rt_task(p))) {
 		/*
 		 * RR tasks need a special form of timeslice management.
diff -Naurp linux-2.5.72/include/linux/sched.h linux-2.5.72-test/include/linux/sched.h
--- linux-2.5.72/include/linux/sched.h	2003-06-18 22:47:19.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.5.72-test/include/linux/sched.h	2003-06-19 20:56:18.000000000 +1000
@@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ struct task_struct {
 
 	unsigned long sleep_avg;
 	unsigned long last_run;
+	unsigned long best_sleep_avg;
 
 	unsigned long policy;
 	unsigned long cpus_allowed;
--Boundary-00=_o9d8+Xno5lG9ejc--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/