It would have send an event over attached opened file. Attached at
creation time.
> This only works for mounts performed in kernel space. It doesn't lend
> itself to performing mounts in userspace and would force autofs to
> re-implement mount(1) parsing/struct packing in kernelspace. Definitely
> not a good solution.
Or if passed event contains opened mountpoint-to-be.
> I'm still partial to the idea that a usenamespace ioctl on
> /proc/<pid>/mounts is a cleaner solution in the long run, both for
> automounting as well as for administration tools.
Vetoed. ioctl() is _not_ an acceptable way to implement any generic
functionality. It basically says "my interface is a garbage".
And yes, we need to think about a new syscall for mount-related
work. With sane API - mount(2) one is _not_. sys_mount() would
still stay, obviously.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/