Re: [PATCH] 2.4 preemption bug in bh_kmap_irq
Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Thu, 19 Jun 2003 14:16:58 +0200
On Tue, Jun 17 2003, Robert Love wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 10:27, Joe Korty wrote:
>
> > The bug is that bh_map_irq *conditionally* calls kmap_atomic (which
> > disables preemption as one of its functions), while bh_unmap_irq
> > *unconditionally* calls kunmap_atomic (which enables it). This
> > imbalance results in a occasional off-by-one preempt_count, which in
> > turn causes IDE PIO mode interrupt code (specifically, read_intr) to
> > erronously invoke preempt_schedule while at interrupt level.
>
> Thanks for this (and sorry for the very delayed reply).
>
> I am going to put this in the 2.4.21 preempt-kernel patch, because
> actually someone else here at MontaVista fixed the problem in the same
> exact way a loooong time ago and it seems to work.
>
> I agree it is suboptimal and I will be happy to take patches from
> someone else with a better idea. Until then, simplicity rules. Thanks.
See 2.5 for the right fix.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/