[BENCHMARK] 2.4.20 vs 2.5.71 comparison

Mark Peloquin (peloquin@austin.ibm.com)
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:18:04 -0500


Thought some of you might get a kick out of seeing this. :)

Nightly Regression Summary
for
2.4.20 vs 2.5.71

Benchmark Pass/Fail Improvements Regressions Results Results Summary
--------------- --------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- -------

dbench.ext2 P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
dbench.ext3 P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
dbench.jfs P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
dbench.reiser P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
dbench.xfs P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
kernbench P N N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
lmbench P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
rawiobench P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
specjbb P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
specsdet P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
tbench P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
tiobench.ext2 P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
tiobench.ext3 P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
tiobench.jfs P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
tiobench.reiser P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
tiobench.xfs P Y Y 2.4.20 2.5.71 report
volanomark P Y N 2.4.20 2.5.71 report

http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.5.71/2.4.20-vs-2.5.71/

Mark

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/