I did get glibc 2.3.2 compiled with gcc 3.3 against the 2.5.70 headers
with only 3 changes made to the glibc source.
The result on the other hand wasn't pretty. Most programs did run fine,
"ls" was not one of them. It would segfault. (Note to self: If glibc's
"make check" fails, don't install it.)
Your first comment is something I had wondered about for a while. A
stable set of userspace kernel headers. That would be nice. Of course
changes could be made to reflect new kernel interfaces. So they should
still be distributed with the kernel source. Then glibc could be
compiled against those updates, and the headers installed as the system
default. But it wouldn't be so forbidden for userspace to touch them.
-- Chris- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/