Wow. That's more accurate than a highly expensive Caesium standard.
And there's one inside most architectures? Wow, we're got a great
deal there, haven't we? 8)
> > Please do not add CLOCK_TICK_RATE to the ia64 timex.h header file.
>
> It needs to be declared there. The only question is regarding the
> value it is defined to, and it would have to be somebody with better
> knowledge of the ia64 than me who decides that. All I can do is to
> post a reasonable default until such decision is made.
If this is the case, we have a dilema on ARM. CLOCK_TICK_RATE has
been, and currently remains (at Georges distaste) a variable on
some platforms. I shudder to think what this is doing to some of
the maths in Georges new time keeping and timer code.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/