Re: force_successful_syscall_return() buggy?

[Aneesh Kumar K.V]

David S. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 10:55, Russell King wrote:
> 
>>I'm not actually talking about subsequent syscalls issued by the kernel.
>>I'm talking about stuff like init, bash, and the module tools.
> 
> 
> Wrong, after the go for the first time into user space, the
> next trap into the kernel will put the pt_regs at the top at
> the stack where we expect it to be.
> 

I was facing a simillar problem with ptrace on Alpha (ptrace on alpha 
expect the pt_regs at current + 2*PAGE_SIZE for 2.4. kernel  ) w.r.t 
www.openssi.org project. What i found was that  even after we return to 
user space subsequent syscalls are not putting pt_regs at that offset. I 
guess while entering the kernel kernel stack pointer always point to 
value stored in thread_struct.ksp ?

-aneesh