RE: [patch] input: Fix CLOCK_TICK_RATE usage ... [8/13]

David Mosberger (davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com)
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:57:23 -0700


>>>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 11:51:00 +0100, "Riley Williams" <Riley@Williams.Name> said:

Riley> 2. The IA64 arch didn't define CLOCK_TICK_RATE at all, but
Riley> then used the 1193182 value as a magic value in several
Riley> files. I've inserted that as the definition thereof in
Riley> timex.h for that arch.

AFAIK, on ia64, it makes absolutely no sense at all to define this
magic CLOCK_TICK_RATE in timex.h. There simply is nothing in the ia64
architecture that requires any timer to operate at 1193182 Hz.

If there are drivers that rely on the frequency, those drivers should
be fixed instead.

Please do not add CLOCK_TICK_RATE to the ia64 timex.h header file.

--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/