Re: 2.5.70-mm9

Mingming Cao (cmm@us.ibm.com)
14 Jun 2003 17:41:29 -0700


On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 01:01, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Was elevator=deadline observed to fail in earlier kernels? If not then it
> may be an anticipatory scheduler bug. It certainly had all the appearances
> of that.
Yes, with elevator=deadline the many fsx tests failed on 2.5.70-mm5.

> So once you're really sure that elevator=deadline isn't going to fail,
> could you please test elevator=as?
>
Ok, the deadline test was run for 10 hours then I stopped it (for the
elevator=as test).

But the test on elevator=as (2.5.70-mm9 kernel) still failed, same
problem. Some fsx tests are sleeping on io_schedule().

Next I think I will re-run test on elevator=deadline for 24 hours, to
make sure the problem is really gone there. After that maybe try a
different Qlogic Driver, currently I am using the driver from Qlogic
company(QLA2XXX V8).

Thanks,

Mingming

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/