If reliability is less important than performance, and you have more
sequential writes than random writes, then you would get a performance
boost, and those (limited) cases might want to turn write cache on. Disk
benchmark apps are one example.
However, most environments have a lot more small random writes than
sequential writes, and so don't even see a performance improvement from
turning disk write cache on.
The OS type or version shouldn't affect this, in principle.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthias Andree [mailto:matthias.andree@gmx.de]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 5:25 AM
To: Linux-Kernel mailing list
Subject: SCSI Write Cache Enable in 2.4.20?
Hi,
I haven't followed the status of write barrier patches recently, I am
wondering if it's still "necessary" (to avoid file system corruption) to
disable the write cache of a SCSI disk drive when the machine doesn't
have an uninterruptible power supply or if instead the file systems and
driver know how to use ordered tags. (Fujitsu MAP drive: 8 MB cache,
AIC7880 adapter, SuSE Linux 8.2 patched 2.4.20 kernel with ext3 and xfs)
TIA,
-- Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/