On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 11:58, Yoav Weiss wrote:
> Actually, I forgot that swsusp is now included. I haven't tried it in a
> while. Anyone knows if its stable enough to start playing with encrypting
> it ?
Sorry for the slow response - I guess Pavel didn't notice your question
either. In it's current form in the 2.5 kernel, swsusp is stable enough
to try encrypting the data. However you might want to wait as the 2.4
version is nearly at its 1.0 release, and the plan is for me to then
start submitting a whole swag of patches that will make the code much
more feature complete. The 2.4 code includes support for compressing the
image; I guess we'd want to hook encryption in at the same point (it
will use BIO calls, not the swap read/write routines).
Regards,
Nigel
-- Nigel Cunningham 495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New ZealandYou see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. -- Romans 5:6, NIV.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/