Re: SMP question

[J.A. Magallon]

On 06.12, Scott Robert Ladd wrote:
> J.A. Magallon wrote:
> > In short, for FP intensive tasks, hyperthreading is a big lie...
> > You can't run 2 computations in parallel.
> 
> Yes and no; the benefit of HT depends on the application in question. 
> I've seen everything from a 5% LOSS in performance to a 30% INCREASE in 
> performance, for intensive floating-point code. This is with programs 
> parallelized with OpenMP and Intel's C and Fortran compilers. I'm still 
> analyzing the exact nature of the benefits, but they *do* exist.
> 
> While I much prefer multiple physical CPUs to "virtual" CPUs, HT *does* 
> provide performance improvements for certain applications. To call HT a 
> "big lie" is both provacative and inaccurate.
> 

I told that because non-techical people just think they are buying _two_
processors, but they really pay too much for 1.25 processors, and that
if you fine-tune your code...

-- 
J.A. Magallon <[e-mail]>      \                 Software is like sex:
werewolf.able.es                         \           It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.21-rc8-jam1 (gcc 3.3 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3-1mdk))