Re: Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 vs. Broadcom BCM9430x

Anders Karlsson (anders@trudheim.com)
12 Jun 2003 21:35:57 +0100


This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your
E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages.

--=_courier-29221-1055450218-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 16:15, Marc Sowen wrote:
> Hi everybody,

Hullo,

> I hope this is not too off-topic, but the fact is that neither the Intel
> PRO/Wireless 2100 (Centrino) chipset nor the Broadcom BCM9430x (e.g.
> Dell Truemobile 1180/1300/1400) chipset is currently supported in Linux
> due to FCC regulation problems.

I have pointed out to Intel that 802.11b is _not_ subject to FCC
regulation problems and I hope they will release a driver for the
802.11b Intel/PRO 2100 mini-PCI cards sometime in the (near?) future. It
would be a sensible thing to do IMHO.

> Anyhow, I plan to get a new Notebook within the next 2 or 3 weeks and I
> need to decide, whether to go for the Intel PRO/Wireless 2100 or the
> Broadcom BCM9430x chipset. I know it's hard to say, but what do you
> think, which company (Intel or Broadcom) is more likely to release the
> necessary documents and/or drivers for their chipsets? Both companys
> seem to ignore all inquiries concerning Linux support at the moment.

How long is a piece of string? I get replies from Intel when I write to
them, but it is all a bit vague. They will not commit to anything, which
is is frustrating.

/A

--=_courier-29221-1055450218-0001-2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+6OQsLYywqksgYBoRAqjmAKCe9mQ2XrCkvZgkkzAWFpvFVqfBfwCfQsyu
HRv8AoDF9fZjCf9vWGFGcwM=
=pCuS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=_courier-29221-1055450218-0001-2--