> Does my patch meet the requirements that you had for __d_drop()
> ?
I still need a real fix for d_move(). In addition, I'm getting worried
about the changes in functionality that you've introduced here. It
seems to me that your lockless scheme opens for a *lot* of races:
Look at all those functions that take dcache_lock, and then test
dentry->d_count. Unless I'm missing something here, your d_lookup()
clearly has them all screwed, no?
Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/