Re: [PATCH] New x86_64 time code for 2.5.70

Bryan O'Sullivan (bos@serpentine.com)
11 Jun 2003 12:56:52 -0700


On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 12:18, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Does it only look this way or is your white space really broken?

I generated the patch with diff -b because my original changes fixed up
a lot of broken whitespace, which somewhat obscured the functional
changes. I'll send the plain diff -u instead next time.

> On UP the sync_core is not really needed, but more reliable. May be worth
> it to stick into an #ifdef though.

OK.

> > }
> >
> > + call++;
> > +
>
> What's that?

Oops - a piece of instrumentation that got left behind from trying to
fix an SMP deadlock.

<b

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/