Re: [BK-CVS gateway] version tags

Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:47:31 -0700

I'll go look. CVS takes way too long to tag, it forces a rewrite of
every file. I did attempt to filter out tags that weren't of the forn
v2.* but it looks like I screwed up.

On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 04:44:37PM +0200, Pascal Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I noticed both the 2.4 and 2.5 BK->CVS trees don't have version tags
> any more (v2_5_70, for example, as in the old tree).
>
> Is this intentional? Did CVS take too long to tag all files or something?
>
> It was quite a nice feature to have them, very useful for finding out the
> differences between certain kernel versions. I can live without it,
> though. It's still a nice service without the tags. (Thanks!)
>
> --
> Ciao,
> Pascal

-- 

---
Larry McVoy              lm at bitmover.com          http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/