Re: cachefs on linux

[Shawn]

Well, it's a nice way to simulate writing on r/o filesystems IIRC. Like
mounting a cdrom then writing to it, but you're not.

Was that was this was? Anyway, linux also does not have unionFS. If it
was that big of a deal, someone would write it. As it is, it's a
whizbang no one cares about enough.

On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 15:42, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:26:01PM -0300, Leonardo H. Machado wrote:
> > 
> > Why has Solaris a CacheFS file system, while linux doesn't?
> 
> Is this a "You don't know it, you don't need it" thing?
> 
> 
> 
> Bis denn