Hi!
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> Now I really hope its the last one, all this rc's are making me mad.
>
;-)
So, here's a report on the more positive side...
As I mentioned in some e-mails in the last few days,
I'm currently testing an Asus AP1700-S5 server with
a single Xeon 2.4GHz CPU (FSB533), 512MB RAM and
4x36GB U320SCSI drives (3 of them are assembled as RAID5),
connected via GBit Ethernet to our internal network
root@setup:~ {533} $ lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20-HE Host Bridge (rev 31)
00:00.1 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20-HE Host Bridge
00:00.2 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20-HE Host Bridge
00:02.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 02)
00:03.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)
00:0f.0 ISA bridge: ServerWorks CSB5 South Bridge (rev 93)
00:0f.1 IDE interface: ServerWorks CSB5 IDE Controller (rev 93)
00:0f.2 USB Controller: ServerWorks OSB4/CSB5 OHCI USB Controller (rev 05)
00:0f.3 Host bridge: ServerWorks GCLE Host Bridge
00:10.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks: Unknown device 0101 (rev 03)
00:10.2 Host bridge: ServerWorks: Unknown device 0101 (rev 03)
00:11.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks: Unknown device 0101 (rev 03)
00:11.2 Host bridge: ServerWorks: Unknown device 0101 (rev 03)
02:04.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 (rev 07)
02:04.1 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 (rev 07)
03:02.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82544GC Gigabit Ethernet Controller (LOM) (rev 02)
root@setup:~ {538} $ uptime
2:05pm up 18:09, 11 users, load average: 8.03, 8.45, 8.15
This system is running 2.4.21-rc7 for more than 18 hours
now with the following load:
*) an endless loop to create and remove a large file on the
RAID5 (ext3 filesystem):
while true; do time dd if /dev/zero of /var/tmp/largefile bs 1M count 2000 ; rm -f /var/tmp/largefile; done
*) some commands to create additional load:
cd /
find . boot/ usr/ tmp/ opt/ var/ -xdev -type f -exec md5sum {} \;
*) NFS copy of a whole 40GB filesystem tree from a Linux NFS server
to the RAID5 (in a loop)
*) the system is also NFS serving a Linux NFS client, which
copies the whole server filesystem into /dev/null
*) Additionally, I have the following programs running:
- Squid (currently used as proxy for our internal web browsers)
- Apache
- jedit (with j2sdk-1.4.1_01)
- StarOffice-5.2
- Mozilla-1.3.1
- and lots of additional programs (shell, sshd, emacs), but
no X server (we are using Linux workstations as X-Terminals)
All in all, there are more than 190 processes at any point in
time in the past 18 hours.
This all produces a permanent load between 7 and 9
vmstat 1
procs memory swap io system cpu
r b w swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id
0 4 4 111720 3220 11344 423820 0 0 4 18976 4892 4273 2 68 30
0 4 3 111720 3204 11352 423728 32 0 80 25216 1460 2095 0 15 85
0 4 3 111716 3332 11352 423364 76 0 92 25796 1432 1895 2 14 84
0 4 3 111716 3208 11372 423392 48 0 712 26336 1566 2346 4 14 81
0 6 3 111716 3208 11412 423196 132 0 420 32820 1774 3113 12 19 69
0 5 3 111716 3376 11440 422340 704 0 924 24444 1570 2811 3 17 79
6 2 4 111716 2328 11560 423988 536 0 700 32088 2268 4590 6 73 21
11 3 4 111764 63352 11604 321148 16 308 310 36868 2267 5390 12 46 42
root@setup:~ {537} $ uptime
1:37pm up 17:41, 10 users, load average: 7.94, 7.31, 7.18
Under this circumstances, I made the following observations:
a) The system runs stable for more than 18 hours now
b) It seems to behave quite fine, given the load.
Response time for all services (web-proxy, web-server)
is reasonable low (you almost don't notice any delay)
c) Interactive programs (Mozilla, StarOffice, JEdit) are
still quite usable. There is some delay when opening
a file in SO (say, about 2-3 seconds), but that's fine
d) Sometimes (but not really reproducable) I noticed a
_big_ delay when connecting to the server using SSH
(with "big", I mean 1 minute or so). I eventually
get a connection, and then can work as normal.
e) The server uses a single, but hyperthreaded CPU.
Hyperthreading is enabled, and Linux shows both
logical CPU's:
root@setup:~ {529} $ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 2
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 2392.169
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
bogomips : 4771.02
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 2
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 2392.169
cache size : 512 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
bogomips : 4771.02
But interrupt distribution seems a little bit strange:
root@setup:~ {530} $ cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
0: 6318080 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 967 0 IO-APIC-edge keyboard
2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade
4: 32477 0 IO-APIC-edge serial
5: 55629300 0 IO-APIC-level eth0
9: 85639064 0 IO-APIC-level acpi, ioc0, ioc1
11: 0 0 IO-APIC-level usb-ohci
15: 2 0 IO-APIC-edge ide1
NMI: 0 0
LOC: 6318529 6318527
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
With 2.4.21-rc6-ac1, interrupts where counted for both
logical CPU's. Is this a bug or a feature?
HTH
- - andreas
- --
Andreas Haumer | mailto:andreas@xss.co.at
*x Software + Systeme | http://www.xss.co.at/
Karmarschgasse 51/2/20 | Tel: +43-1-6060114-0
A-1100 Vienna, Austria | Fax: +43-1-6060114-71
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE+3zMOxJmyeGcXPhERAu6CAKCILyOUfPyGaKG8pvbl4droch6B+ACbBNB/
Dw1L/tRv2JSrOHA12B8BaHM=
=rWPF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/