Re: /proc/bus/pci

William Lee Irwin III (wli@holomorphy.com)
Wed, 4 Jun 2003 20:35:32 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] PCI: remove usage of pci_for_each_dev() in sound/oss/via82cxxx_audio.c"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [BENCHMARK] AIM7 fserver regressed in 2.5.70*"

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:21:43PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> I notice that /proc/bus/pci doesn't offer a sane
> interface for multiple PCI domains and choice of BAR.
> What do people think of this?
> bus/pci/00/00.0 -> ../hose0/bus0/dev0/fn0/config-space
> bus/pci/hose0/bus0/dev0/fn0/config-space
> bus/pci/hose0/bus0/dev0/fn0/bar0
> bus/pci/hose0/bus0/dev0/fn0/bar1
> bus/pci/hose0/bus0/dev0/fn0/bar2
> bus/pci/hose0/bus0/dev0/fn0/status

I would be happy with such an interface.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] PCI: remove usage of pci_for_each_dev() in sound/oss/via82cxxx_audio.c"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [BENCHMARK] AIM7 fserver regressed in 2.5.70*"