Re: Linux 2.4.21-rc6

Matthias Mueller (matthias.mueller@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de)
Tue, 3 Jun 2003 18:53:15 +0200

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:30:27AM +0800, Michael Frank wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 June 2003 00:02, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> -rc6 is better - comparable to 2.4.18 in what I have seen with my script.
>
> After the long obscure problems since 2.4.19x, -rc6 could use serious
> stress-testing.
>
> User level testing is not sufficient here - it's just like playing roulette.
>
> By serious stress-testing I mean:
>
> Everone testing comes up with one dedicated "tough test"
> which _must_ be reproducible (program, script) along his line of
> expertise/application.
>
> Two or more of these independent tests are run in combination.

Agreed and I'm willing to run test-scripts on my system, that has these
hangs (long ones with 2.4.19-pre1 to 2.4.21-rc5 and only short ones with
2.4.21-rc6). But at the moment I have neither time nor enough knowledge to
write a test to reproduce it.

So if someone comes up with a suitable test skript, I'm happy to try it
and use it on different kernel versions.

Bye,
Matthias

-- 
Matthias.Mueller@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de
Rechenzentrum Universitaet Karlsruhe
Abteilung Netze
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/