no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 80 93.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.69-mm3 1 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.69-mm5 1 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.69-mm6 1 78 96.2 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.70 1 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.70-mm2 1 78 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 76 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.69-mm3 1 76 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.69-mm5 1 76 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.5.69-mm6 1 76 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.97
2.5.70 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.70-mm2 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.96
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 2 181 41.4 196.5 58.0 2.26
2.5.69-mm3 2 176 42.0 183.0 56.2 2.23
2.5.69-mm5 2 176 42.6 182.5 55.7 2.23
2.5.69-mm6 2 176 42.0 184.5 55.7 2.26
2.5.70 2 109 67.9 63.5 28.4 1.38
2.5.70-mm2 2 108 68.5 65.5 28.7 1.38
Same changes put into 2.5.70 are evident in mm2
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 3 103 75.7 0.0 0.0 1.29
2.5.69-mm3 3 126 63.5 1.0 4.8 1.59
2.5.69-mm5 3 114 70.2 1.0 5.3 1.44
2.5.69-mm6 3 112 70.5 1.0 5.4 1.44
2.5.70 3 103 75.7 0.0 0.0 1.30
2.5.70-mm2 3 118 66.9 1.0 5.1 1.51
probably not statistically significant
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 3 106 72.6 1.0 3.7 1.32
2.5.69-mm3 3 111 69.4 1.7 4.5 1.41
2.5.69-mm5 3 102 75.5 1.0 4.9 1.29
2.5.69-mm6 3 107 72.0 1.3 4.7 1.37
2.5.70 3 106 72.6 1.0 3.8 1.34
2.5.70-mm2 3 123 61.8 2.0 4.8 1.58
small rise in time with multiple small file extraction
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 4 343 22.7 120.5 19.8 4.29
2.5.69-mm3 4 319 24.5 105.3 18.1 4.04
2.5.69-mm5 4 137 56.9 49.6 19.0 1.73
2.5.69-mm6 4 150 52.0 53.4 18.7 1.92
2.5.70 5 326 21.5 112.9 18.7 4.13
2.5.70-mm2 4 115 67.0 42.0 19.1 1.47
large drop in time with one large file write
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 2 127 61.4 55.5 24.4 1.59
2.5.69-mm3 2 133 58.6 47.1 18.7 1.68
2.5.69-mm5 2 115 67.8 46.4 20.7 1.46
2.5.69-mm6 2 120 65.0 50.9 21.5 1.54
2.5.70 2 122 63.9 53.8 22.1 1.54
2.5.70-mm2 2 113 68.1 46.2 20.4 1.45
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 2 104 75.0 6.3 4.8 1.30
2.5.69-mm3 2 113 69.9 9.1 6.1 1.43
2.5.69-mm5 2 113 69.9 9.0 6.2 1.43
2.5.69-mm6 2 115 68.7 9.1 6.1 1.47
2.5.70 2 104 75.0 6.3 4.8 1.32
2.5.70-mm2 2 106 73.6 8.2 5.7 1.36
seems to correlate with .70 changes
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 2 95 81.1 0.0 5.3 1.19
2.5.69-mm3 2 95 81.1 0.0 7.4 1.20
2.5.69-mm5 2 96 80.2 0.0 7.3 1.22
2.5.69-mm6 2 96 80.2 0.0 7.3 1.23
2.5.70 2 96 80.2 0.0 7.3 1.22
2.5.70-mm2 2 94 81.9 0.0 7.4 1.21
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 2 98 79.6 60.5 2.0 1.23
2.5.69-mm3 2 135 59.3 77.0 2.2 1.71
2.5.69-mm5 2 99 79.8 53.0 2.0 1.25
2.5.69-mm6 2 100 79.0 60.0 2.0 1.28
2.5.70 2 97 80.4 53.5 2.1 1.23
2.5.70-mm2 2 99 78.8 54.5 2.0 1.27
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 4 374 20.3 5.0 48.1 4.67
2.5.69-mm3 4 653 11.6 6.2 34.0 8.27
2.5.69-mm5 4 316 24.1 4.0 44.6 4.00
2.5.69-mm6 4 386 19.9 5.2 48.4 4.95
2.5.70 5 321 22.1 4.0 44.5 4.06
2.5.70-mm2 4 305 24.9 4.8 55.4 3.91
I tried getting runs on 2.5.69-mm9 and 2.5.70-mm1 but ran into BUGs that have
been reported before on lkml.
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+28p4F6dfvkL3i1gRAvsgAJ4mf8syPqOXkNt+tuNaoFgdMQZ8KQCdH/Er
wWRW9HrkWqpd9UTIeR/Lzz4=
=ly6r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/