Re: [2.5 patch] let USB_GADGET depend on USB

[Adrian Bunk]

On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 04:39:28PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >USB_GADGET is still selectable even with USB disabled. It seems the 
> >following is intended:
> 
> This is wrong.
> 
> CONFIG_USB has always represented the master/host side ... while
> CONFIG_USB_GADGET represents just the slave/gadget side.
> 
> The two are completely independent.  Hardware that supports
> one will typically _not_ support the other.  And systems
> that support the slave/gadget side will have no use at all
> for the 100KB+ of "usbcore".
>...

Well, CONFIG_USB_GADGET without CONFIG_USB gives me the following link 
error in 2.5.70-mm3:

<--  snip  -->

...
  LD      .tmp_vmlinux1
security/built-in.o(.text+0x246d): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list_lock'
security/built-in.o(.text+0x2481): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list_lock'
security/built-in.o(.text+0x248d): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list'
security/built-in.o(.text+0x2493): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list'
security/built-in.o(.text+0x24b3): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list'
security/built-in.o(.text+0x24ba): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list_lock'
security/built-in.o(.text+0x24c0): In function `find_usb_device':
: undefined reference to `usb_bus_list_lock'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1

<--  snip  -->

If you disagree with my patch please fix the compilation of 
CONFIG_USB_GADGET without CONFIG_USB.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed