Re: SCO's claims seem empty

Mark Mielke (mark@mark.mielke.cc)
Fri, 30 May 2003 16:20:53 -0400

On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:01:53PM +0200, Paul Rolland wrote:
> Look at Sco's answer :
> http://ir.sco.com/ReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID=110126

It sounds as if SCO did a diff against Linux and is claiming that any
sections of lines that match, line for line, are being claimed as
'stolen'. It worries me that the panel of 'experts' they are inviting
to 'see for themselves' are members of the media. How will they know
what they are looking at, whether the code is original or not, or whether
it was SCO who stole the code from Linux?

mark

-- 
mark@mielke.cc/markm@ncf.ca/markm@nortelnetworks.com __________________________
.  .  _  ._  . .   .__    .  . ._. .__ .   . . .__  | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/    |_     |\/|  |  |_  |   |/  |_   | 
|  | | | | \ | \   |__ .  |  | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__  | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada


  One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
                       and in the darkness bind them...


                           http://mark.mielke.cc/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/