So leave it out. No need to put it back in...
Hanna
--On Friday, May 30, 2003 06:05:24 PM +1000 Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com> wrote:
> In message <12430000.1054244110@w-hlinder> you write:
>> --On Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:02:50 PM -0700 Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Ick, this patch should be reverted, it should not be removing
>> > sx_hungup() for no reason. I think Hanna agrees with this.
>>
>> Yup. Sorry. Not sure what happened there. Here is the patch
>> to replace the sx_hangup function. This is based off 2.5.70-bk3
>> and I have compiled it but dont have the hardware to test it.
>
> Yes, but I don't think you need to put back the comment about
> decrementing use counts 8)
>
>> +/* I haven't the foggiest why the decrement use count has to happen
>> + here. The whole linux serial drivers stuff needs to be redesigned.
>> + My guess is that this is a hack to minimize the impact of a bug
>> + elsewhere. Thinking about it some more. (try it sometime) Try
>> + running minicom on a serial port that is driven by a modularized
>> + driver. Have the modem hangup. Then remove the driver module. Then
>> + exit minicom. I expect an "oops". -- REW */
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
> --
> Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/