Re: drivers/char/sysrq.c

[Jörn Engel]

On Fri, 30 May 2003 16:44:55 +0200, Margit Schubert-While wrote:
> 
> In drivers/char/sysrq.c (2.4 and 2.5) we have :
> 
>         if ((key >= '0') & (key <= '9')) {
>                 retval = key - '0';
>         } else if ((key >= 'a') & (key <= 'z')) {
> 
> Shouldn't the "&" be (pedantically) "&&" ?

It is semantically the same.  If you can show that gcc optimization
also creates the same assembler code, few people will object to a
patch.

Jörn

-- 
Measure. Don't tune for speed until you've measured, and even then
don't unless one part of the code overwhelms the rest.
-- Rob Pike