Re: [CHECKER][PATCH] cmpci user-pointer fix

[Junfeng Yang]

> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> I believe the attached patch fixes it. cm_write was calling access_ok,
> but after that you must still access user space through the
> get/put/copy*_user functions. It should be safe to return -EFAULT at
> these points in cm_write, since there are other returns already in the
> code above and below that. Compile-tested only.

Thanks a lot for the fixes!

>
> Junfeng, the checker seems to have missed the "*dst0++ = *src++;" bits
> at the bottom of the patch... or at least it wasn't in the mail I saw
> ("4 potential user-pointer errors", 2 May 2003).

I deliberately surpressed 'redudant' error reports.  When the checker saw
multiple errors caused by the same user pointer in one function, it'll
only report one error for this user pointer in this function.  if I don't
do so, people tend to get bored by the 'repeated' messages, and leave
error reports in other functions uninspected. ;) I'll re-run the checker
soon with the suppression off.

-Junfeng