Re: [patch] Inline vm_acct_memory

[Andrew Morton]

Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> I found that inlining vm_acct_memory speeds up vm_enough_memory.  
>  Since vm_acct_memory is only called by vm_enough_memory,
>  theoritically inlining should help, and my tests proved so -- there was
>  an improvement of about 10 % in profile ticks (vm_enough_memory) on a 
>  4 processor PIII Xeon running kernbench.

OK.  But with just a single call site we may as well implement vm_acct_memory()
inside mm/memory.c.  Could you please make that change?

Thanks.