>
>On Tue, 27 May 2003, manish wrote:
>
>>Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
>>
>>>On Tuesday 27 May 2003 20:33, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi Marcelo,
>>>
>>>>It seems your "fix-pausing" patch is fixing a potential wakeup
>>>>miss, right? (I looked quickly throught it). Could you explain me the
>>>>problem its trying to fix and how?
>>>>
>>>Please have also a look here:
>>>
>>>http://hypermail.idiosynkrasia.net/linux-kernel/archived/2002/week45/0305.html
>>>
>>>ciao, Marc
>>>
>>Hello !
>>
>>I applied the fix-pausing-2 patch to the 2.4.20 kernel. This time on,
>>the stack trace:
>>
>>sys_write
>>generic_file_write
>>ext2_get_group_desc
>>bread
>>__wait_on_buffer
>>schedule
>>
>
>Huh? You mean bonnie still deadlocks or ?
>
Well, this is to the kernel that has the io_request_lock removed. The
stock kernel (with the fix-pausing-2 patch) is running fine upto now.
However, we will have to give it a few hrs of runtime.
Thanks
Manish
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/