Re: Linux 2.5.70 compile error

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 08:19:39PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
>> This has other advantages too, one can see now which options were newly 
>> added and the individual help texts are accessible.

On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:40:16PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> Given that 99% of users will be choosing option 1, it might be a
> good thing to have the remaining options only shown if a
> CONFIG_X86_SUBARCHS=y and have things default to option 1 if =n.

I'll see about this once I get to looking at making CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ
harder to accidentally trip over (unless someone else does it first).

-- wli