Re: [PATCH] fix do_fork() return value

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> # Noticed by Julie DeWandel <[e-mail]>.
> # 
> # do_fork() needs to return the pid (or error), not the pointer to the
> # resulting process structure.  The process structure may not even be
> # valid any more, since do_fork() has already woken the process up (and as
> # a result it might already have done its thing and gone away).
> # 
> # Besides, doing it this way cleans up the users, which all really just
> # wanted the pid or error number _anyway_.
> 
> Just FYI: the change was done in the first place to allow spawning a
> new init thread as CPUs come up.  But now we have copy_process it can
> be done neatly (it should also be done out of keventd so we get a
> clean thread, but that's another story).
> 
> Note that this version also has a (theoretical) race, except hidden
> by the time to wrap PIDs ie. "never happens".

We have more such wrappers. IIRC, it is possible to go into
/proc/PID/something, and just stay there, kill the process, and wait
for PIDs to wrap around, fun stuff happens...
								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]