Hi,
On May 23, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
> Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 16:02:18 -0700
>
> Looks like David converted this macro into a no-op, then moved it into
> netdevice.h.
>
> Problem is, some non-network drivers were using it too.
>
> They shouldn't, it's backwards compatability crap for net drivers
> only. Use explicit ->owner references elsewhere.
Well, as mentioned in my other mail there ARE many occurrences of=20
SET_MODULE_OWNER, for example in the ISDN subtree (just give 'grep' a try).=
=2E.
> Maybe we should put it back the way it was and go edit all the
> netdrivers?
>
> Absolutely not.
Oops, that's what the patch in my other mail does...
> Yoshfuji posted a patch on linux-kernel to fix this already.
Sorry, I must have missed this patch - that would have made my work obsolet=
e -=20
but I'd like to see how that supports all the other SET_MODULE_OWNER calls=
=20
from all the other places...
Best regards
Thomas Schlichter
--Boundary-02=_G0Vz+n87a/VArN2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA+zV0GYAiN+WRIZzQRAsSNAJsEphdyMR9iGKG/tqcLUV5imimHrQCdE2Up
hH7ijIO+JbBc4pUI9RKSQbI=
=cAXo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Boundary-02=_G0Vz+n87a/VArN2--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/